Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(6): e2316642, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20236202

RESUMEN

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a reduction in routine in-person medical care; however, it is unknown whether there have been any changes in visit rates among patients with hematologic neoplasms. Objective: To examine associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and in-person visits and telemedicine use among patients undergoing active treatment for hematologic neoplasms. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data for this retrospective observational cohort study were obtained from a nationwide electronic health record-derived, deidentified database. Data for patients with hematologic neoplasms who had received at least 1 systemic line of therapy between March 1, 2016, and February 28, 2021, were included. Treatments were categorized into 3 types: oral therapy, outpatient infusions, and inpatient infusions. The data cutoff date was April 30, 2021, when study analyses were conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: Monthly visit rates were calculated as the number of documented visits (telemedicine or in-person) per active patient per 30-day period. We used time-series forecasting methods on prepandemic data (March 2016 to February 2020) to estimate expected rates between March 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021 (if the pandemic had not occurred). Results: This study included data for 24 261 patients, with a median age of 68 years (IQR, 60-75 years). A total of 6737 patients received oral therapy, 15 314 received outpatient infusions, and 8316 received inpatient infusions. More than half of patients were men (14 370 [58%]) and non-Hispanic White (16 309 [66%]). Early pandemic months (March to May 2020) demonstrated a significant 21% reduction (95% prediction interval [PI], 12%-27%) in in-person visit rates averaged across oral therapy and outpatient infusions. Reductions in in-person visit rates were also significant for all treatment types for multiple myeloma (oral therapy: 29% reduction; 95% PI, 21%-36%; P = .001; outpatient infusions: 11% reduction; 95% PI, 4%-17%; P = .002; inpatient infusions: 55% reduction; 95% PI, 27%-67%; P = .005), for oral therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (28% reduction; 95% PI, 12%-39%; P = .003), and for outpatient infusions for mantle cell lymphoma (38% reduction; 95% PI, 6%-54%; P = .003) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (20% reduction; 95% PI, 6%-31%; P = .002). Telemedicine visit rates were highest for patients receiving oral therapy, with greater use in the early pandemic months and a subsequent decrease in later months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with hematologic neoplasms, documented in-person visit rates for those receiving oral therapy and outpatient infusions significantly decreased during the early pandemic months but returned to close to projected rates in the later half of 2020. There were no statistically significant reductions in the overall in-person visit rate for patients receiving inpatient infusions. There was higher telemedicine use in the early pandemic months, followed by a decline, but use was persistent in the later half of 2020. Further studies are needed to ascertain associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent cancer outcomes and the evolution of telemedicine use for care delivery.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pandemias , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia
2.
Blood advances ; 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2236478

RESUMEN

Prior publications have demonstrated low rates of seroconversion to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this national collaboration of 11 cancer centers around the United States, we aimed to further characterize and understand the vaccine-induced immune response, including T-cell responses and the impact of CLL therapeutics (NCT04852822). Eligible patients were enrolled into two cohorts: 1) at the time of the initial vaccination and 2) at the time of booster vaccination. Serologic response rates (anti-S) from the 210 patients in the initial vaccination cohort and 117 in the booster vaccination cohort were 56% (95% CI, 50-63%) and 68% (95% CI, 60-77%), respectively. Compared to patients not on therapy, those receiving B-cell-directed therapy were less likely to seroconvert (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.49). Persistence of response was seen at 6 months;anti-S titers increased with administration of booster vaccinations. In the initial vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between quantitative serologic response and CD4 T-cell response for the Wuhan variant and to a lesser degree, for the Omicron variant (Spearman ρ = 0.45 for Wuhan, ρ = 0.25 for Omicron). In the booster vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between serologic response and CD4 T-cell responses for both variants (ρ = 0.58 Wuhan, ρ= 0.57 Omicron) and to a lesser degree for CD8 T-cell responses (ρ = 0.33 Wuhan, ρ = 0.22 Omicron). While no deaths from COVID-19 were reported after booster vaccinations, patients should use caution as newer variants emerge and escape vaccine-induced immunity.

3.
Blood Adv ; 2022 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162273

RESUMEN

Prior publications have demonstrated low rates of seroconversion to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this national collaboration of 11 cancer centers around the United States, we aimed to further characterize and understand the vaccine-induced immune response, including T-cell responses and the impact of CLL therapeutics (NCT04852822). Eligible patients were enrolled into two cohorts: 1) at the time of the initial vaccination and 2) at the time of booster vaccination. Serologic response rates (anti-S) from the 210 patients in the initial vaccination cohort and 117 in the booster vaccination cohort were 56% (95% CI, 50-63%) and 68% (95% CI, 60-77%), respectively. Compared to patients not on therapy, those receiving B-cell-directed therapy were less likely to seroconvert (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.49). Persistence of response was seen at 6 months; anti-S titers increased with administration of booster vaccinations. In the initial vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between quantitative serologic response and CD4 T-cell response for the Wuhan variant and to a lesser degree, for the Omicron variant (Spearman P = 0.45 for Wuhan, P = 0.25 for Omicron). In the booster vaccination cohort, positive correlations were seen between serologic response and CD4 T-cell responses for both variants (P = 0.58 Wuhan, P = 0.57 Omicron) and to a lesser degree for CD8 T-cell responses (P = 0.33 Wuhan, P = 0.22 Omicron). While no deaths from COVID-19 were reported after booster vaccinations, patients should use caution as newer variants emerge and escape vaccine-induced immunity.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA